Project by Projects

In our previous post, we made one thing clear: legal reforms are not the finish line. In fact, for many Nigerian women, that line barely signals the beginning of a transformation. Justice—particularly gender justice—requires more than legislation. It requires the building of a delivery system that is not just gender-aware, but actively works to dismantle the barriers that have historically kept women at the margins of economic life.

This post draws on learnings from our Addressing Gender Gaps in Nigeria: A WBL 2024 Case Study and subsequent systems analysis to map out a detailed, context-aware Law-to-Life Journey Framework. This is not a theoretical ideal. It is rooted in the messy, political, and practical realities of Nigeria’s policymaking and implementation ecosystem.

Why This Matters

Too often, gender laws in Nigeria are passed with significant effort but little foresight into their delivery. Where community engagement exists, it is often tokenistic, limited to one-off town halls, poorly documented, and removed from the actual shaping of the law. Implementation tends to focus on awareness campaigns with little attention to systemic readiness, infrastructure, budget lines, or institutional mandates. The result? A well-written law that changes nothing on the ground.

So what does it take to move from good intentions to real outcomes? Below is a detailed, systems-based delivery framework that outlines what gender-responsive policy implementation could look like—from co-design to enforcement to lived impact.

Law-to-Life Journey Framework: A Systems-Based Model

Step 1. Participatory Policy Co-Design

• Community Engagement as Input, Not Optics: Replace checkbox and tokenistic consultations with traceable influence mechanisms. Every consultation should have a feedback loop about what was heard, what was used, what was discarded and why.
• Engage Informal Workers, Women’s Cooperatives, and Grassroots Movements: These are not just beneficiaries—they are frontline implementers. Legal texts must reflect their lived realities.
• Intersectional Data Gathering: Gender-disaggregated data is the bare minimum. Disaggregate further by age, class, geography, disability, and marital status.
• Political Economy Analysis: Surface whose interests are threatened or served by this law. Build accountability plans early.

Step 2. Institutional Design and Infrastructure Readiness

• Map Lead and Support Ministries/Agencies: Assign clear roles. Who leads? Who delivers? Who regulates? Who funds?
• Gender Desk with Teeth: Gender units must have mandate, resources, and escalation power—not just advocacy roles.
• Policy-Budget Alignment: No law should pass without a costing model and funding commitment embedded in the national and state-level budgets.
• Delivery Infrastructure: Are courts accessible? Are civil registries digitized? Can women safely report violations? Identify choke points. Are there private sector accountability mechanisms in place?

Step 3. Decentralized Implementation and Local Adaptation

• Subnational Capacity Assessment: Many states lack functional institutions to implement gender laws. Conduct readiness diagnostics.
• Local Government Buy-In: LGAs must be incentivized (and resourced) to act—not just informed. Align laws with local development plans.
• Customary and Religious Interface: Work with—but do not be held hostage by—traditional systems. Provide legal harmonization guidelines where plural legal systems exist.
• Private Sector Accountability Systems. Require employer-level compliance tracking on gender equity indicators for hiring, pay, and promotion—especially at the entry level.
• Street-Level Bureaucrat Training: Teachers, health workers, traditional leaders, local judges—equip the frontline.

Step 4. Civic Infrastructure and Community Uptake

• Rights Literacy Campaigns: Go beyond IEC materials. Use local media, storytelling, peer-to-peer training.
• Civil Society as Implementers: Fund CSOs to serve as rights enablers, case trackers, and watchdogs—not just awareness partners.
• Employers—especially in the private sector—are not invisible actors, but held accountable as system-level implementers of equity.
• Grievance Redress Systems: Ensure women know where to go, how to file, and what to expect—digitally and in person.
• Informal Economy Integration: Target women in agriculture, petty trade, and domestic work. Adapt implementation tools to their realities.

Step 5. Accountability, Feedback, and Course Correction

• Real-Time Monitoring: Use digital dashboards, citizen report cards, and open data to track progress.
• Lived Experience Feedback Loops: Build systems to collect and analyze qualitative data from the women affected.
• Public Performance Reviews: Annual reporting on delivery benchmarks by state and federal institutions.
• Adaptive Management: Create legal and institutional space for adjusting rules, strategies, and budgets as realities shift.

Final Word:

A law is only as powerful as the systems built to deliver on its promise. And in a country as complex as Nigeria, a delivery system must be designed—not assumed.

Justice for women cannot be wished into being. It must be structured, funded, staffed, and defended—from bill drafting to the street corners of Ibadan, the farm plots of Benue, and the markets of Kano. That’s what the Law-to-Life journey demands.

In our final post in this series, we’ll explore what it means to invest in delivery as a strategic priority—and why this is the real frontier for gender systems transformation in Nigeria and beyond.

Still Learning. Still Curious.